Cases 71 - 80 of 635
Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan v. Cellar Collections, Inc.
as 2:2021cv12786
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Cellar Collections, Inc.
In re: American Rivers, et al v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-16961
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Defendant:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Denver Lee v. USA, et al
as 21-1738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENVER E. LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CITY OF DETROIT, MI, CITY OF WAYNE, MI and others
Ani Gharibian, et al v. Valley Campus Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 21-56253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANI GHARIBIAN, Relator; ex rel United States of America
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY CAMPUS PHARMACY, INC., DBA TNH Advanced Speciality Pharmacy, DIPLOMAT PHARMACY, INC. and OPTUMRX, INC.
Braziel et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Doretha Braziel, Ronesha Braziel, Deana Braziel and others
Defendant:
Governor Gretchen Whitmer, State of Michigan - Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, Director Liesi Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ronnie Thomas v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 21-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE DANTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, Warden, in her individual and official capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan, E. HARDIMAN, Library Tech, in her individual and official capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan and P. MERCER, Assistant Library Tech, in his individual and official capacity as an employee of the State of Michigan
Resurrection School, et al v. Elizabeth Hertel, et al
as 21-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RESURRECTION SCHOOL and CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, individually and as next friend on behalf of his minor children C.M., Z.M., and N.M.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SMITH, individually and as next friend on behalf of her minor child F.S.
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HERTEL, in her official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA VAIL, in her official capacity as the Health Officer of Ingham County and CAROL A. SIEMON, in her official capacity as the Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
