Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Paulino Molina v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 09-70066
Petitioner:
PAULINO MOLINA, AKA Pablo Molina
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, NANCY ALCANTAR, Officer in Charge of the San Francisco Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
USA v. Pedro Alcantar-Gutierrez
as 08-30464
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO ALCANTAR-GUTIERREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03741
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Alcantar et al
as 5:2008cv02412
Plaintiff:
Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.
Defendant:
Celedonia Alcantar and Jose Luis Alcantar
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00239
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maria Vasquez De Alcantar v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-71427
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA VASQUEZ DE ALCANTAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Ricardo Alcantar-Lopez
as 08-1740
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO ALCANTAR-LOPEZ
Kassem v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007at00637
Plaintiff:
Nageeb Kassem
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Julie Myers, Nancy Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kassem v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nageeb Kassem and Nora Kassem
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Julie Myers, Nancy Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
