Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 114
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16412
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant: Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Satoshi Okubo
Respondent: Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party: Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
: In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant: SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014mc02542
Defendant: Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
Plaintiff: Indirect Purchasers, Direct Purchasers, JBR Inc and others
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02542
Plaintiff: Yelda Mesbah Bartlett, Bay Valley Foods, LLC, Lavinia Simona Biasell and others
Defendant: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, and others
Interested Party: JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: All Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petitioner: Sagentia, Inc. and Sagentia, Ltd.
Special Master: Hon. Barbara S. Jones
Not Classified By Court: Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 13-80210
Defendant - Petitioner: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS and others
IN RE: Vehicle Carrier Services Antitrust Litigation
as MDL NO. 2471
Plaintiff: Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, End Payors and others
Defendant: Liaison Counsel for Defendant(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?