Cases 81 - 90 of 462
Callahan v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04401
Plaintiff:
Dewaine Callahan
Defendant:
Mark Laret, Nuance Communications, Inc., Daniel Brennan and others
Hopkins v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04352
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Laura Kaiser, Bob Finocchio, Mark Laret and others
Coleman v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02668
Defendant:
Laura Kaiser, Bob Finocchio, Mark Laret and others
Plaintiff:
Tia Coleman
DiGiovanni v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04264
Defendant:
Laura Kaiser, Bob Finocchio, Mark Laret and others
Plaintiff:
Frank DiGiovanni
Sims, Jr. v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04271
Defendant:
Laura Kaiser, Bob Finocchio, Michael Katz and others
Plaintiff:
William Sims, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Stein v. Nuance Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Defendant:
Laura Kaiser, Bob Finocchio, Mark Laret and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Orso v. Kaiser
as 6:2021mc00072
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Defendant:
Eric Kaiser
(PS) Reyes v. Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
as 2:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Irvin Reyes
Defendant:
Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniel Gonzalez, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 21-15485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCCI GARRETT, MICHAEL DION LUCAS, DANIEL GONZALEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WELL-PATH MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, FKA California Forensic Medical Group, IGNONT, Deputy, DENNIS HOUGHTELLING and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TORRES, ARTEMIO GONZALEZ, TROY POWELL and others
Kaiser v. Navient Solutions, LLC
as 1:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Candice Kaiser
Defendant:
Navient Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
