Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Steele v. Saratoga County, New York et al
as 1:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Alice Steele
Defendant:
Saratoga County, New York, Andrew Jarosh and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
AbduR-Rahman et al v. Mcmillion et al
as 1:2022cv07231
Plaintiff:
Yusuf' AbduR-Rahman and Jamal Ibin Yusuf AbduR-Rahman Smalls
Defendant:
Doug Mcmillion, Jim Walton, Samuel Robson Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ryan v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv05111
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Thomas J. Sullivan, Joshua H. Levine and others
Mortman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
Frederick Mortman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Waterman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03341
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03302
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Stein v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04423
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Schallman v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04391
Plaintiff:
Nanci Schallman
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC v. CorePoint Lodging Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Main Line Capital Investments, LLC
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging Inc., Keith A. Cline, James R. Abrahamson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
