Cases 1 - 10 of 7,346
Kelly v. Montgomery County and City Board et al
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Montgomery County and City Board doing business as Montgomery County and City Board ("MCCB"), John Baker, Andrea McCain and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Radiance Technologies Inc v. Baker
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Radiance Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Jade Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Sidney W Jackson, IV
Defendant:
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Gugel et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 7:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M Gugel and Karen M Gugel
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc, Thor Industries Inc, Tiffin Motor Homes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Planet Home Lending LLC v. United States of America On Behalf of The Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Planet Home Lending LLC
Defendant:
United States of America On Behalf of The Department of Housing and Urban Development and Dana Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
