Cases 1 - 10 of 261
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff:
John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Alessi v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
John Alessi
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bridgestone Corporation, Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Connor v. AIS Solar, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
AIS Solar, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Connor v. White Glove Med Labs, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv06142
Plaintiff:
Jay C. Connor
Defendant:
White Glove Med Labs, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 3:2023cv05408
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Connor v. Monster Reservations Group LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
Monster Reservations Group LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morton v. Collins et al
as 6:2023cv04913
Plaintiff:
Lokein Morton
Defendant:
John Collins, Laurie LaChapelle, Kim Hussey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
