Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kenneth A. Thomas MD, LLC v. Medcom Medical Messaging, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Thomas MD, LLC
Defendant:
Medcom Medical Messaging, Inc., Physicians Answering Group Exchange, Inc. and Ronald Ray Brock, II
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Roh v. Shultz et al
as 3:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dillon Roh
Defendant:
Karl L. Shultz, Joanna Nunan, William G. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
v. yarosh et al
as 2:2014cv01927
Claimant:
karen yarosh
Defendant:
donald todrin, aaron todrin, Eric Pierson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type:
Other Statutes
Monk et al v. Mabus et al
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Cottam, James Davis, Kevin Marret and others
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James, Ray Mabus and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Azubuko v. Massachusetts Port Authority Taxi Dispatcher et al
as 3:2010cv00238
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Massachusetts Port Authority Taxi Dispatcher, Massachusetts Legislators, Jeffrey Mullan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Davie v. Norwalk et al
as 3:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Davie
Defendant:
City of Norwalk , Ray DeCamillo and Harry Rilling
Cross_claimant:
Ray DeCamillo
Cross_defendant:
City of Norwalk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
