Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Leung v. Bluebird Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10335
Plaintiff:
Peter Leung
Defendant:
Nick Leschly, bluebird bio, inc. and Chip Baird
Petitioner:
Ralph Petrillo and Jerry R. Hannah
Mullane v. Gants et al
as 1:2019cv10407
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
Michele B Hogan, Maura Healey and Ralph D. Gants
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
The City of Medford v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2019cv10262
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Reade, Jr v. Warren et al
as 1:2018cv12200
Defendant:
Elected Officials of ; Newton, Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Lawrence as Santuaries Cites, William William Galvin, Maura Healey and others
Plaintiff:
William Reade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Adelman v. Luke et al
as 1:2017cv10712
Plaintiff:
John L. Adelman
Defendant:
Ken Luke, Ralph Gants, Nathanial Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tyler v. Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, et al
as 1:2017cv10272
Plaintiff:
Heather Tyler
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Ralph Gants, Margot Botsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport et al v. Collecto, Inc.
as 1:2014cv10532
Plaintiff:
Ralph Davenport and Richard Davenport
Defendant:
Collectco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melanson v. Nelson et al
as 1:2011cv11673
Plaintiff:
Herman R. Melanson
Defendant:
William T. Nelson, Lee M. Nelson, Joanne Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
