Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Wright v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wright v. Johnson & Wales University
as 3:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Johnson & Wales University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wright v. EBY, LLC
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Eby, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WRIGHT v. EBY, LLC
as 2:2023cv02921
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WRIGHT
Defendant:
EBY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WRIGHT v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
TALESHA WRIGHT
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WOODS
as 2:2021mc00065
Receiver:
A. COTTEN WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JOHN J. WOODS
Justice, II v. AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES et al
as 2:2021cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES, CHARLES D FITE, WILLIAM A ROBOTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02735
Defendant:
THOMAS W WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V REYNOLDS, TONEY K ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. AEGION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01914
Defendant:
AEGION CORPORATION, WALTER J GALVIN, STEPHEN P CORTINOVIS and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
