Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Morgan et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Lauren Ashley Morgan, Erik Barnes, Sherry Bason and others
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Co. and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro and Laura Boelens
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Zachary Corradino, Samantha Reyes, Patrick Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Casterlow-Bey v. Amazon.com et al
as 3:2017cv05833
Plaintiff:
Gary Casterlow-Bey
Defendant:
Amazon.com , Google.com, Barnes and Nobles.com and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Barnes v. EEOC
as 2:2016cv00558
Plaintiff:
Business Darene Barnes
Defendant:
EEOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Business Darene Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. Barnes et al
as 2:2015mc00175
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michelle Lynne Barnes
Garnishee:
Conifer Revenue Cycle Solutions LLC
United States of America v. Barnes et al
as 2:2015mc00174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michelle Lynne Barnes
Garnishee:
Starbucks Corporation
Ortego et al v Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01840
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Ortego , John S. Apolis , Victor D. Armfield and others
Defendant:
Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc., Mark R. Sexton, Douglas Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deep9 Corporation v. Barnes & Noble Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00134
Plaintiff:
Deep9 Corporation
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble Inc and Barnesandnoble.Com LLC
Barnes v. NCO Financial Systems Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00676
Plaintiff:
Toni Barnes
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems Inc and Tamia Stokes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
