Cases 1 - 10 of 17
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. CASTILLO et al
as 2:2023cv03744
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
HELEN M. CASTILLO and DONDE LA TIA HELEN LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VASWANI, INC. v. MANJUNATHAMURTHY et al
as 2:2020cv20288
Defendant:
NANJUNDAPPA MADHUSUDHAN, POWERFIRM VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, INC., RADHIKA RAO and others
Plaintiff:
Vaswani, Inc and VASWANI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CESAR CASTILLO, LLC v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv06255
Defendant:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv18053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASTILLO v. CHASE BANK et al
as 3:2019cv15435
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK and CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANCHEZ CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. v. MYLAN, INC., et al
as 2:2017cv02813
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC.
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC. , MYLAN SPECIALTY, L.P. , PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. v. TELIGENT, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv09592
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC.
Defendant:
TELIGENT, INC., PERRIGO COMPANY PLC, TARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
