Cases 1 - 10 of 48
New York State Firearms Association v. Chiumento
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK STATE FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, GEORGE BORRELLO, DAVID DIPIETRO and others
Defendant:
DOMINICK L. CHIUMENTO, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. RHS Chiropractic, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02172
Defendant:
Clarissa Felix, Roman Israilov, RHS Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nicodemo DiPietroIn re: Nicodemo DiPietro
as 24-1292
Petitioner:
In re: NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
United States of America v. Rudaj
as 24-321
Defendant:
NARDINO COLOTTI, NIKOLA DEDAJ, PRENKA IVEZAJ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX RUDAJ, Sandro Rudovic, Uncle and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
New York State Firearms Association et al v. Chiumento
as 6:2023cv06524
Plaintiff:
New York State Firearms Association, George Borrello, David DiPietro and others
Defendant:
Steven A. Nigrelli and Dominick L. Chiumento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 23-1183
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE EDWARD MCBRIDE and PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY
Nicodemo DiPietroIn re: Nicodemo DiPietro
as 22-3308
Petitioner:
In re: NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 22-2270
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
CARVANA PHILADELPHIA, CARVANA CO, CARVANA LLC and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 22-2271
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Respondent:
WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, DON HANKEY, BRET HANKEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
