Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Conry, et al v. Gerber Products Company, et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conry, Kelsey Daker, Hailey Ronayne and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Perrigo Company PLC, L. Perrigo Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Hall v. Physicians to Women Inc.
as 7:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Janet Hall
Defendant:
Physicians to Women Inc. and Physicians to Women, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Crum v. Walden Commons Corporate Office
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
David Hall Crum
Defendant:
Walden Commons Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clement v. Hall
as 1:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Audrey Clement
Defendant:
Kym Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mason v. Blow et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Peggy Gilman, K.P. Johnson, UpCenter and others
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brian David Hill
Defendant:
Glen Andrew Hall, Esq., Lauren McGarry, Esq., Matthew Scott Thomas Clark, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
