Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Valadez-Cazares et al v. Montes-Villalpando et al
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Valadez-Cazares, Maurilio Osorio-Carreno and Juan Manuel Gomez-Garcia
Defendant:
Roberto Montes-Villalpando, Abraham Montes, El Cubilete LLC and others
Montes v. George
as 8:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Carolyn B. George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Dozier v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02549
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dozier
Ang v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01521
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Kai Ang
Wang v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02346
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Alexander et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2021cv02351
Plaintiff:
Hannah Mason, Kathleen Lynn Alexander, Holly Lau Abraham and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Torres et al. v. Sanchez et al.
as 1:2019cv09357
Plaintiff:
Rafael Acero Torres, Kapalejayo Inc., Mario Rafael Pancracio Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Dilia Margarita Baez and Jairo Enrique Sanchez
Soliman v. WageWorks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07419
Defendant:
Jerome D. Gramaglia, Carol A. Goode, Robert L. Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
Botros Sollman and Botros Soliman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Nixon v. WageWorks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07120
Defendant:
Jerome D. Gramaglia, Stuart C. Harvey, Jr., Robert L. Metzger and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nixon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
