Cases 1 - 10 of 760
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Defendant:
Acands Inc., Amchem Products Inc., Armstrong World Indu. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson B. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles King v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as VAE/4:09-CV-03268
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles King
William Standridge, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81535
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
William Standridge
Clint Shuffield, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81530
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Clint Shuffield
Alberta Mills, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81499
Plaintiff:
Alberta Mills
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Shirley Cornell, et al. v. Amchem Products Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83299
Plaintiff:
Shirley Cornell
Defendant:
Amchem Products Inc
Virginia Henry, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81624
Plaintiff:
Virginia Henry
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Betty Taylor, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81540
Plaintiff:
Betty Taylor
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
