Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Ali Akbar Azimov, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 22-56034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI AKBAR AZIMOV and IZATILLO GAFFAROV
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, under his title of Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Azimov et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al. et al
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Ali Akbar Azimov and Izatillo Gaffarov
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Frederick Jones, Sr. v. California Men's Colony, et al
as 21-55324
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, California, BRIAN A. DODD, C/O, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, Warden, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK JONES, Sr., AKA Hakim Akbar-Jones, AKA Hakim Ali-Akbar, AKA Hakeem Abdullah Hussein, AKA Kikongo Hakim-Akbar Jones and FREDERICK JONES, Sr., AKA Hakim Akbar-Jones, AKA Hakim Ali-Akbar, AKA Hakeem Abdullah Hussein
GHADAMI et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv00397
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOVENIER, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
SARA GHADAMI and ALI AKBAR GHADAMY
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rubin et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2018cv01689
Plaintiff:
Jenny Rubin , Deborah Rubin , Daniel Miller and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rubin, et al v. Islamic Republic, et al
as 1:2003cv09370
Plaintiff:
Jenny Rubin, Deborah Rubin, Daniel Miller and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Respondent:
University of Chicago and Gil Stein
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Peterson
Amicus Curiae:
The National Iranian-American Council
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Estate of Siavash Bayani et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 3:2017mc00154
Plaintiff:
Estate of Siavash Bayani , Fatemeh Bayani , Babak Bayani and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Burnett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-09903
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Burnett, Sr. , Beverly Burnett , Antoinette D. Ognibene and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini-Khamenei , Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and others
Petitioner:
Anne Marie McCann , Lillian C. Tetreault , Michael J. Gibbons and others
Receiver:
Philip Smith and Raffaella Crisci
Shaul Stern, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 14-7203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shaul Stern, individually and as legal representative of the Estate of Leah Stern, Joseph Stern, Shimson Stern and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
Susan Weinstein, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 14-7193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Susan Weinstein, individually as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Ira William Weinstein, and as natural guardian of plaintiff David Weinstein (minor), Jeffrey A. Miller, as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Ira William Weinstein, Joseph Weinstein and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Appellee:
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
