Cases 1 - 10 of 760
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Defendant:
Acands Inc., Amchem Products Inc., Armstrong World Indu. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson B. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles King v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as VAE/4:09-CV-03268
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles King
Jannie Davis, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81587
Plaintiff:
Jannie Davis
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Debra Erwin, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81600
Plaintiff:
Debra Erwin
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Billy Ray Eubanks v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81601
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Eubanks
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Sandra Sue Forbus, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81610
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sue Forbus
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Lloyd Davidson, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81585
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Davidson
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Willie E. Jones, et al. v. Amchem Products, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81484
Defendant:
Amchem Products, Inc
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
