Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Qaid et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Nabaa Qaid, Lareen Al-Maliki and Al-Yan Al-Maliki
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States of America, The, Department of State, The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Safi v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
Shamim Bibi Safi and Alamzaib Safi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Donald Blome and Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shahram Alinaghiyan et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv06008
Plaintiff:
SHAHRAM ALINAGHIYAN and PRECISE COMPANY
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Anthony J. Blinken, Julie A, Eadeh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Fermin Aguas Marquez et al v. United States Department of State et al.
as 8:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Fermin Aguas Marquez and Sergio Aguas Saldana
Defendant:
United States Department of State, Anthony J. Blinken, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sheikholeslami v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Seyed Mohammad Saeid Sheikholeslami
Defendant:
United States Department of State, Hon. Anthony J. Blinken, Jeffry L. Flake and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Houshang Yousefi-Fard v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Houshang Yousefi-Fard
Defendant:
United States Department of State, Hon. Anthony J Blinken, Sean Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Behring Regional Center LLC v. Majorkas et al
as 3:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Behring Regional Center LLC
Defendant:
Alejandro Majorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Anthony J Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
