Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Randolph v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Michael Blake Randolph
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erick Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Sisson v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brian Sisson
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erik Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leah Rosenfeld IRA v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Leah Rosenfeld IRA
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erik C Blachford, Amy C Bohutinsky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zillow Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Dua v. Barton et al
as 2:2021cv00285
Nominal Defendant:
Zillow Group Inc
Defendant:
Richard N. Barton, Gregory B. Maffei, Jay C. Hoag and others
Plaintiff:
Arjun Dua
Interested Party:
Mr. Duncan C Turner
Klein v. Barton et al
as 2:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Defendant:
Richard N. Barton , Erik C. Blachford , Lloyd D. Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: April Boutillette Brinkman
as 2:2017rd00116
Plaintiff:
April Boutillette Brinkman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sciabacucchi et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2017cv01568
Defendant:
Richard N. Barton, Gregory B. Maffei, Kathleen Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Zillow Group, Inc and Matthew Sciabacucchi
Nominal Defendant:
Zillow Group Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Consolidated Defendant:
April Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
