Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Cameron v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Eli Lilly & Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Lewis
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency and Educational Credit Management Corporation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KForce Inc. v. Gray et al
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
KForce Inc.
Defendant:
Lonnie Gray, Evan Eley, Michael Robison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AssuredPartners of Kentucky, LLC v. English et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
AssuredPartners of Kentucky, LLC
Defendant:
Robert S. English and English Insurance Group, Inc.
Taylor et al v. KKR & Co., L.P. et al
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tia Taylor, Ashley Hall-Nagy and Bobby Estes
Defendant:
KKR & Co., L.P., Henry R. Kravis, George R. Roberts and others
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
