Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04419
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRINGLE et al v. BRINGLE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01243
Plaintiff: A. M., TRACI BRINGLE, BETTY JONES and others
Defendant: SCOTT BRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02466
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02941
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Newsome et al v. Marion General Hospital
as 1:2014cv00245
Plaintiff: Roger D Newsome and Betty Newsome
Defendant: Marion General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
LENNON v. RECOVERY TWO, INC., et al
as 1:2014cv00417
Plaintiff: BETTY J. LENNON
Defendant: PERRY LAW OFFICE, P.C. and RECOVERY TWO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent: TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01245
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?