Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Judy Dickenson v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
as 5:2015cv01092
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Plaintiff:
Judy Dickenson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin v. Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP et al
as 1:2015cv00290
Defendant:
Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP and Melissa Galvan
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wethy v. Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP et al
as 3:2013cv02547
Plaintiff:
David M Wethy and 4458 Savage Station Family Land Trust
Defendant:
Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner & Engel, LLP , Bank of America and Leslie D Patton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodriguez v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Movant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel LLP and Latreese Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2012xc00353
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Movant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel LLP and Latreese Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
