Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ZICKERT v. BAYER CROP SCIENCE INC. et al
as WIW/3:13-CV-00250
Plaintiff:
ZICKERT
Defendant:
BAYER CROP SCIENCE INC
In Re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI) v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2011cv05311
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , CBS Corporation, Owens-Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
In Re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Liston v. Bayer Crop Science, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:11-CV-00203
Defendant:
Bayer Crop Science, Inc
Plaintiff:
Liston
Budig, Delaine v. Bayer Crop Science, Inc. et al
as WIW/3:11-CV-00061
Defendant:
Bayer Crop Science, Inc
Plaintiff:
Budig, Delaine
John Loss v. Ao Smith Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71573
Plaintiff:
John Loss
Defendant:
Ao Smith Corporation, AO Smith Corp., A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc. and others
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant:
Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant:
The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant:
Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
