Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mike Redford v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73469
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIKE REDFORD, RAJEEV V. DATE, Director, individual capacity, PHILIP LERMA, official capacity and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Thompson v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thompson v. Facebook, Inc.
as 0:2020cv60076
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 19-35594
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HOLLOPETER, In his Official and Individual Corridor Officer on Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BILL DOMAN, in his official and individual capacity as acting assistant superintendent of correctional rehabilitation and senior supervisor of law library services and M. Rojas and H. Mackenzie at the Snake River Correctional Institution, MARK NOOTH, in his individual and official capacity as eastside institution administrator of the Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, AKA Charles J. Johnson, AKA Charles James Johnson, AKA Asmar H. Saleem, AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem
Thompson v. Facebook, Inc.
as 0:2019cv60698
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
