Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In Re: Adient PLC Securities L
as 20-3846
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Donald McDonald, Adient PLC, Jeffrey M. Stafeil and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bristol County Retirement System
Plaintiff:
Julio Barreto, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Charles Eric Hyder, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Hyder v. Adient PLC et al
as 1:2018cv09630
Defendant:
Bruce McDonald, Jeffrey M. Stafeil and Adient plc
Plaintiff:
Charles Eric Hyder
IN RE ADIENT PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv09116
Plaintiff:
Julio Barreto
Defendant:
R. Bruce McDonald, Jeffrey M. Stafeil and Adient plc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Charles Eric Hyder
Lead Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Petitioner:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 793, Members Pension Benefit Trust of Ontario and Hawaii Laborers Pension Fund
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. McDonald et al
as 4:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bruce McDonald, James William Bowling and Rooster and Roses Sports Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
