Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Immokalee Water & Sewer District v. 3M Company et al
as FLM/2:23-CV-00384
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Immokalee Water & Sewer District
Town of Plainville v. 3M COMPANY, et al.
as MA/1:23-CV-11204
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Plainville
APPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CORPORATION v. 3M Company et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11158
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC INC., Raytheon Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
APPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CORPORATION
Town of Norwell v. 3M Company et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11115
Defendant:
3M Company, RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.) and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Norwell
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as WAE/1:23-CV-03068
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Acosta, Gabriel Acosta, Jr., Marilena Acosta and others
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv03668
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. The 3M Company et al
as 3:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Red Cliff Band Of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians and Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
Defendant:
The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Prince George's County v. 3M Company et al
as MD/8:22-CV-00121
Plaintiff:
Prince George's County
Defendant:
3M Company, Raytheon Technologies Corp., E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
