Other Statutes Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cherry et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00332
Plaintiff: Meghan Cherry and Kimen Trochalakis
Defendant: RealPage Inc, Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Trammell Crow Company LLC and others
Interested Party: Gabriel Navarro and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Olymbec USA LLC v. CWFS Insight LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv02059
Defendant: John Doe Members of Lenox Park B, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., CWFS Insight LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2016mc00049
Plaintiff: Quincy D Scott, Sr.
Defendant: Josh Rhodes, Jim Shaw, Freddie Shultz and others
Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc v. Tennessee Production Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2013mc00024
Plaintiff: Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc
Defendant: Tennessee Production Center, Inc., John Norbert Stovall and Debi Stovall
Green v. CCA/South Central Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2010mc00010
Plaintiff: Shawn Green
Defendant: CCA/South Central Correctional Facility, Cherry Lindamood, Leigh Kilzer and others
Montague v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010mc00067
Plaintiff: Charles Montague
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, Daniel Pritchard and others
Kotewa v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2010mc00002
Plaintiff: Thomas Edward Kotewa
Defendant: Cherry Lindamood, Dennis Ceres, Daniel Pritchard and others
Bostic v. Lindamood et al
as 3:2010mc00004
Petitioner: James E. Bostic
Respondent: Cherry Lindamood, State of Tennessee and Department of Corrections
Powers v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2010mc00001
Plaintiff: Rudolph Powers
Defendant: Cherry Lindamood and (f/n/u) Kilzer
Cureton v. Lindamood
as 3:2009mc00128
Petitioner: Brian Cureton
Respondent: Cherry Lindamood

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?