Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Milford Christian Church et al v. Russell-Tucker et al
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Milford Christian Church, James Loomer, Janet Parady and others
Defendant:
Charlene M Russell-Tucker, Beth Bye and Manisha Juthani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Chien v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Andrew K Clark , William K Grogan , LeClairRyan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Soundkeeper, Inc. et al v. A-Rite Used Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00844
Plaintiff:
Soundkeeper, Inc. , Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. and Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
A-Rite Used Auto Parts, Inc., 116 Christian Lane, LLC and 94 Christian Lane, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Thompson v. Morgan et al
as 3:2011cv01766
Plaintiff:
Mel Thompson
Defendant:
Elio Morgan, Law Offices of Elio Morgan, Eric H. Opin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wilson et al v. DirectBuy Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson, Regina Ingram, Gary Ingram and others
Defendant:
DirectBuy Inc, United Consumers Club Inc and Direct Buy Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
