Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rena, Inc v. City of Lincoln Nebraska et al
as 4:2021cv03001
Defendant:
City of Lincoln Nebraska, Patricia D. Lopez, Leiron Gaylor Baird and others
Plaintiff:
Rena, Inc doing business as The Foxy Gentlemen's Club and Rena, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner:
City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
