Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03367
Petitioner:
PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION, PHILIP N BURGESS and others
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SIEGEL et al v. PLATKIN et al
as 1:2022cv07463
Plaintiff:
AARON SIEGEL, JASON COOK, JOSEPH DELUCA and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW PLATKIN and PATRICK J. CALLAHAN
Amicus Curiae:
Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re RenovaCare, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 2:2021cv13766
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE A BOLLER
Defendant:
RENOVACARE, INC., HARMEL RAYAT, THOMAS BOLD and others
In Re:
RENOVACARE, INC. SECURTIES LITIGATION
Petitioner:
JOEL MORRELL, MARC JAY GANNON and THOMAS AGOSTINELLI
Lead Plaintiff:
DIANA DEIDAN
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MELVIN EMBERLAND, ZOSER VARGAS and AVIVA MEYER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC et al
as 3:2021cv12971
Defendant:
John Cook, Jr., PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LLC, MICROBILT CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
JUSTUS v. THE MEET GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04314
Defendant:
KEITH RICHMAN, CHRISTOPHER FRALIC, BEDI SINGH and others
Plaintiff:
MARK JUSTUS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
