Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamien Jensen, et al v. EXC Incorporated, et al
as 20-15908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCESCA JOHNSON, NICOLE JENSEN, JUSTIN JENSEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GO AHEAD VACATIONS, a Massachusetts corporation, EXC INCORPORATED, a Nevada corporation, DBA D.I.A. Express Incorporated, DBA Express Charters, NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Todd Cibulka, et al v. City of Madison, et al
as 20-1658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD CIBULKA and SHELLY CIBULKA
Defendant / Appellee:
COREY JOHNSON, BARRETT ERWIN, CITY OF MADISON and others
Warren Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond County, et al
as 19-11087
Defendant / Appellee:
AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY CONSOLIDATED COMMISSIONERS, COREY JOHNSON, GWENDOLYN B. TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN ADAM TAYLOR
MGM Resorts International et al v. Acosta et al
as 2:2018cv01288
Defendant:
Whtiney Day, Treza Mekhail, Chad Packard and others
Plaintiff:
Mandalay Bay, LLC f/k/a Mandalay Corp., MGM Resorts International, Mandalay Resort Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Warren Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond County Consol, et al
as 17-11570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN ADAM TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY CONSOLIDATED COMMISSIONERS, DAVID S. COPENHAVER, COREY JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
