Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Mercy Hospital South v. Becerra et al
as 4:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Mercy Hospital South
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Carole Johnson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Trower et al v. Blinken et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jill Trower and Adam Trower
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CTW Transportation Services, Inc. et al v. Wages
as 4:2019cv00215
Defendant:
Robert Wages, Robert M. Wages, Jeff Campbell Trucking, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CTW Global Logistics, Inc., CTWTransportation Services, Inc. and CTW Transportation Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Francis et al v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Brad Stephen Francis and Christine Carol Francis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In Re: INGE
as 4:2014mc00597
Movant:
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, , WAMU CAPITAL CORP , DAVID M. DUZYK and others
Respondent:
THERESA INGE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Aguilar et al v. Dankenbring et al
as 4:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
Richard Aguilar , Melba Aguilar , Clark Amos and others
Defendant:
James Dankenbring and Spencer Fane Britt & Browne, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
