Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SHORETTE v. WILKIE
as 1:2019cv04430
Plaintiff:
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES R. SHORETTE and CHARLES R. SHORETTE
Defendant:
ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ROBERT WILKIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
EWING v. AMERIANA BANCORP et al
as 1:2015cv01491
Defendant:
AMERIANA BANCORP, MICHAEL E. BOSWAY, JENNIFER P. BOTT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL F. EWING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GILMAN et al v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
DALE P. ARMSTRONG, GEORGE W. BELSEY, CHARLES R. BLAKLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES I-X, F.E. MORAN OIL COMPANY, MANNON L. WALTERS LLC and others
Interested Party:
MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A1, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2005 A2, LP, MANNON L. WALTERS 2006A, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2007mc00081
Respondent:
DOUGLAS CHARLES AMBERGER, JENNIFER JONES AUGER, DAVID JOHN BACHMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
