Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Frank v. Trilegiant Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01721
Plaintiff:
David Frank
Defendant:
Trilegiant Corporation, Inc., Affinion Group, LLC, Apollo Global Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank v. Trilegiant Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01721
Plaintiff:
David Frank
Defendant:
Trilegiant Corporation, Inc., Affinion Group, LLC, Apollo Global Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Debra Miller, William Thompson, Brittany DiCarolis and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Hope Kelm, Barbara Timmcke, Regina Warfel and others
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Affinion Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citigroup Inc. and Affinion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelm et al v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Hope Kelm , Barbara Timmcke , Regina Warfel and others
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. , Bank of America, N.A. , Capital One Financial Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
