Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clement v. Hall
as 1:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Audrey Clement
Defendant:
Kym Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Colon Health Centers of America, LLC et al v. Hazel et al
as 1:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
Colon Health Centers of America, LLC and Washington Imaging Associates-Maryland, LLC
Defendant:
Bill Hazel , Bruce Edwards , Paul Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nansemond Wharf-Suffolk Properties, LLC, et al v. The Bank of Southside Virginia, et al
as 2:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Nansemond Wharf-Suffolk Properties, LLC , Nansemond Wharf-Olde Towne Properties, LLC , The Young Family Partnership and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Southside Virginia , James W. Clements, II and J. Peter Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kalish et al v. Milliken et al
as 1:2009cv01333
Plaintiff:
Julia Kalish, Suzanne Leitner-Wise, Suzanne Leitner-Wise Inc. and others
Defendant:
Christine T. Milliken, Susan A. Magill, Gilbert T. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clement et al v. LaHood et al
as 1:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
Audrey Clement, John Reeder and Joshua Ruebner
Defendant:
Ray LaHood, Victor Mendez, Roberto Fonseco-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gyamfi v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Petitioner:
Clement Gyamfi
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
