Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandon AdamsIn re: Brandon Adams
as 24-1334
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
NAVIENT CORP and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Richard Smith, III
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Judeau Brown, Jr.In re: Judeau Brown, Jr.
as 23-3066
Petitioner:
In re: JUDEAU S. BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
ROBERT MAY, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Sharon JamesIn re: Sharon James
as 23-2640
Petitioner:
In re: SHARON M. JAMES
Respondent:
COLM F. CONNOLLY, United States Honorable Chief Justice, JOHN A. CERINO and RICHARD G. ANDREWS
Donald ColeIn re: Donald Cole
as 23-2349
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD COLE
Respondent:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, PERRY PHELPS, Warden, FRANK PENNELL, Chaplain and others
Michael Washington v. , et alIn re: Michael Washington v. , et al
as 23-2269
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL T. WASHINGTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COLM F. CONNOLLY
In re: Bernard D. Ellerbe
as 22-1070
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Keith DoughertyIn re: Keith Dougherty
as 20-3394
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
COLM F. CONNOLLY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOSHUA D. WOLSON
Sharon JamesIn re: Sharon James
as 20-2851
Petitioner:
In re: SHARON M. JAMES
Respondent:
AC MOORE ARTS AND CRAFTS INC /SBARS INC, COLM F. CONNOLLY, LAURA DORON and others
Kevin Epperson v. , et alIn re: Kevin Epperson v. , et al
as 19-3211
Respondent:
ABIGAIL LECROW, Superior Court Judge and HENLEY T. GRAVES, Superior Court Judge
Not Yet Classified:
COLM F. CONNOLLY
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN S. EPPERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
