Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner:
FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROSS v. NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSS
Defendant:
NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC, NEWREZ LLC and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCEWEN v. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00153
Defendant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INFOCISION INC and INFOCISION INC doing business as INFOCISION MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MCEWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BATAL-SHOLLER v. BATAL et al
as 2:2021cv00376
Plaintiff:
NANCY BATAL-SHOLLER
Defendant:
MARILYN BATAL, BATAL FAMILY LIVING TRUST, BATAL CORP doing business as BATAL CORPORATION doing business as BATAL AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BATAL-SHOLLER v. BATAL et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
NANCY BATAL-SHOLLER
Defendant:
MARILYN BATAL, BATAL FAMILY LIVING TRUST, BATAL CORP doing business as Batal Corporation doing business as Batal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GRACIANO INC et al v. SANASY et al
as 2:2020cv00015
Defendant:
AER SENESOMBATH, ASIAN CAFE, THAI & I CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
THAI LOTUS RESTAURANT, JOSE GRACIANO and GRACIANO INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRACIANO INC et al v. SANASY et al
as 2:2018cv00374
Defendant:
ASIAN CAFE, SPRUCE CREEK RETAIL OUTLET GROUND TENANT LLC, THAI & I CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
THAI LOTUS RESTAURANT, JOSE GRACIANO and GRACIANO INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
