Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Merrilee Stewart v. Kim Brown, et al
as 23-3690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERRILEE STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE KIM J. BROWN, Franklin County Common Pleas Court and DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General
Grater v. Damascus Township Trustees
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Charles Grater
Defendant:
Damascus Township Trustees and Bates Recycling, Inc.
Interested Party:
Dave Yost Ohio Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
First Choice Chiropractic, LLC, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 20-3038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FONNER, D.C., ALLIED HEALTH & CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, FIRST CHOICE CHIROPRACTIC, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Ohio Governor, DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General and OHIO STATE CHIROPRACTIC BOARD
William Evans, Jr. v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 19-4152
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, United States Supreme Court Justice, CLARENCE THOMAS, United States Supreme Court Justice, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
First Choice Chiropractic, LLC, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-4092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FONNER, D.C., ALLIED HEALTH & CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, FIRST CHOICE CHIROPRACTIC, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Ohio Governor, DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General and OHIO STATE CHIROPRACTIC BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
