Cases 1 - 10 of 19
QP CAPITAL, LLC v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
as 1:2023cv01800
Plaintiff:
QP Capital, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, MARION COUNTY and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Ashley W., et al v. Eric Holcomb, et al
as 21-3028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHLEY W., a minor, by Next Friend Denise Durnell, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services, MILO S., a minor, by Next Friend Robin Herbert, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services, JAIDYN R., a minor, by Next Friend Gabrielle Hull, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, in his official capacity as the Governor of Indiana, TERRY J. STIGDON, in her official capacity as the Director of the Indiana Department of Child Services and DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Eric Holcomb, et al v. Ashley W., et al
as 21-8031
Petitioner:
ERIC HOLCOMB, in his official capacity as the Governor of Indiana, TERRY J. STIGDON, in her official capacity as the Director of the Indiana Department of Child Services and DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Respondent:
ASHLEY W., a minor, by Next Friend Denise Durnell, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services, BETTY W., a minor, by Next Friend Denise Durnell, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services, MILO S., a minor, by Next Friend Robin Herbert, individually on behalf of all children who are or will be in the custody of the Indiana Department of Child Services and others
Arizona Department of Child Sa, et al v. Allegra Green, et al
as 21-16469
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, named as Department of Child Services, Arizona state agency and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, named as Arizona Attorney General
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John Doe
Defendant / Appellant:
GUY KASONGO TSHIBAKA, an individual - parent of minor children on behalf of G.K., G.A.K., L.A.K., C.G.K., C.A.K., AKA Kasongo Tshibaka and ALLEGRA GREEN, an individual - parent of minor children on behalf of G.K., G.A.K., L.A.K., C.G.K., C.A.K.
Yananta Isi Chito Lusa v. Indiana Department of Child Se, et al
as 21-1363
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESA WOODS, JOHN R. LAYTON, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YANANTA ISI CHITO LUSA
Dawn Riddle, et al v. Indiana Department of Child Se, et al
as 20-2788
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI R. KING, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, LYNDSAY KRAUTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATT RIDDLE, individually and on behalf of K.R., M.R., and J.R. and DAWN RIDDLE, individually and on behalf of K.R., M.R., and J.R.
Leo Dillon v. Indiana Department of Child Se, et al
as 20-1832
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW KEPPLER and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEO E. DILLON
Iredell Sanders v. Indiana Department of Child Se
as 19-3067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IREDELL SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Melody Hale v. Indiana Department of Child Se, et al
as 19-2517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELODY J. HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and KOSCIUSKO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Arlena Willes v. Arizona Department of Child Sa, et al
as 19-15723
Respondent / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, named as Department of Child Services (Safety) in original Petition and MARICOPA COUNTY JUVENILE COURT, named as Juvinille Court in original Petition
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARLENA MINERVA WILLES, On behalf of J.D.Z. in the custody of the Child Safety Services on behalf of J.D.Z
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
