Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Woodlands Pride v. Paxton
as 23-20480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Woodlands Pride, Incorporated, Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, In an official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, Brett Ligon, in an official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Montgomery County, Texas and others
World Professional Association for Transgender HeaIn re: World Professional Association for Transgender Hea
as 23-11753
Petitioner:
In re: WORLD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR TRANSGENDER HEALTH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
Reproductive Health Services, et al v. Daryl Bailey, et al
as 17-13561
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, on behalf of its patients, physicians and staff and JUNE AYERS, RN
Defendant - Appellant:
DARYL D. BAILEY, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Alabama and STEVE T. MARSHALL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama
WOJTCZAK v. PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009mc00093
Petitioner:
RICHARD WOJTCZAK
Respondent:
PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNA., DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNA. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
