Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DOHERTY et al v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. et al
as 2:2023mc00088
Plaintiff:
GUDRYN K. DOHERTY, FAUN DOHERTY and EDWARD E. QUAM
Defendant:
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. and RICHARD BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
BARD v. BARD et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. BARD
Defendant:
PATRICK BARD, JOHN BLACK, ALICE DOHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. v Scranton Products, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00853
Defendant:
Scranton Products, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC
Special Master:
James Doherty
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Plaintiff:
Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DOHERTY v. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
as 5:2008cv05818
Plaintiff:
LISA J. DOHERTY
Defendant:
GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAWLS V. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
as 2:2008mc00127
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
RAWLS v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008mc00061
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Review
KEMP et al v. DOHERTY et al
as 2:2008cv01353
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. KEMP and PHYLLIS A. KEMP
Defendant:
STEPHEN DOHERTY, JEFFREY BENNETT, BENNETT & DOHERTY, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
DOHERTY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv03049
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. DOHERTY, JR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
