Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walker v. Analog Devices, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11934
Plaintiff:
Chad I Walker and Pro se litigant Chad I Walker
Defendant:
Analog Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coe Living Trust v. Analog Devices, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11682
Defendant:
Kenton J. Sicchitano, Laurie H. Glimcher, Susie Wee and others
Plaintiff:
Coe Living Trust
UnilocUSA, Inc. et al v. Avaya Inc. et al
as 1:2017mc91082
Plaintiff:
UnilocUSA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.
Defendant:
Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Shoretel, Inc. and others
Movant:
BJ's Wholesale, Inc. , Cimpress USA, Inc. and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Feldstein et al
as 4:2013cv40007
Plaintiff:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Feldstein , Manoo Desai , Nicolas Kociuk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Thompson et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv12419
Plaintiff:
Dawn Thompson , Robert Alan Dishman , Joan Goodman and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Grossman v. Sepal Reproductive Devices, Inc.
as 1:2009mc10288
Plaintiff:
Stewart F. Grossman
Defendant:
Sepal Reproductive Devices, Inc.
Murphy v. LG Philips LCD CO., et al
as 1:2007cv10457
Plaintiff:
Christopher Murphy and Christopher Murphy
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co., Ltd., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lueckel v. NVIDIA Corporation
as 1:2007cv10300
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lueckel
Defendant:
NVIDIA Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
