Cases 1 - 10 of 279
MEADE v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
DONALD C. MEADE
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, ELLEN COOPER, DENNIS GLASS and others
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Appolyon, Inc. v. McLean
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Appolyon, Inc.
Defendant:
Donald McLean
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Castro v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Al Schmidt and Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LITMAN et al v. GUCKIN et al
as 2:2023cv01889
Plaintiff:
CELIA LITMAN, DONALD LITMAN, ARTHUR LITMAN and others
Defendant:
JENNIFER GUCKIN and TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
P&I INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC v. BLIZZARD
as 2:2023mc00031
Petitioner:
P&I INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC
Respondent:
DONALD BLIZZARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SMELTZER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMELTZER
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
