Other Statutes Cases filed in New Jersey
SAMAROO et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2022cv02747
Plaintiff: DAVENDRA SAMAROO and QING DONG
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZEVA v. EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2021cv09859
Defendant: EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC., LEI CHEN and DONG HU
Plaintiff: KONSTANTIN ZEVA
ZEVA v. EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv09859
Defendant: EBANG INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC., LEI CHEN and DONG HU
Plaintiff: KONSTANTIN ZEVA and Brijesh Bhagat
Petitioner: RONALD ANTOSKO, Elad Rachevsky, XIANDE YANG and others
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., et al
as 2:2013cv05850
Plaintiff: ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Defendant: SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., MICHAEL DOBROW, D.O., TAI PAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. KANG et al
as 8:2013mc00111
Respondent: NA-KYUNG KANG and DONG SUNG KIM
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KAUL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02597
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: RICHARD A. KAUL, M.D., NEW JERSEY SPINE & REHABILITATION PC, POMPTON ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LEE v. ROYAL ASIAN BANK et al
as 2:2011cv02301
Plaintiff: DONG HYUN LEE
Defendant: ROYAL ASIAN BANK , ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and EDWARD E. SHIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
J&S PRODUCE, INC. v. KIM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05930
Plaintiff: J&S PRODUCE, INC.
Defendant: DONG II KIM, HERA KIM and ANDY HAJIYEROU
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?