Cases 1 - 10 of 20
EARL v. LAYMA, LLC a/k/a LAYAMA, LLC and d/b/a LITTLE LAKE LENDING et al
as 1:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE EARL
Defendant:
LAYMA, LLC a/k/a LAYAMA, LLC and d/b/a LITTLE LAKE LENDING, BEN G. RAY, III and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stein v. King
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
David M. Stein
Defendant:
Timothy Earl King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CREEKBAUM v. CREEKBAUM
as 2:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EARL CREEKBAUM, III
Defendant:
BEVERLY M. CREEKBAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Adamczyk v. Miller et al
as 3:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
William Adamczyk
Defendant:
Earl Miller, Matthew Gingerich , 5 Star Investment Group I, LLC and others
Movant:
Douglas R Adelsperger
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
