Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Fernando Fontanez v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 24-5028
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President and Janet L. Yellen, U.S. Treasury Secretary
Amicus Curiae:
National Immigrant Justice Center
FONTANEZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and JANET YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
National Association of Government Employees, Inc. v. Yellen, et al
as 23-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET LOUISE YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of Treasury and JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States
Interested Party:
CHRIS BUSH, JOHN PAUL DURBIN and FERNANDO FONTANEZ
FONTANEZ v. BOEING CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
BOEING CORPORATION
Fernando Fontanez v. FBI
as 21-5077
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fernando Fontanez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontanez v. Chatto et al
as 1:2007cv02376
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
James Chatto, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Fontanez v. Dabe
as 1:2006cv07056
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
Jeffery Dabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fontanez v. Parsons et al
as 1:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
Richard Parsons, Glenn Britt, Bob Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Fernando Fontanez
as 1:2007cv00224
In Re:
Fernando Fontanez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
