Cases 1 - 10 of 28
RICHARDSON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83630
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. and others
DEFAZIO v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:10-CV-74141
Plaintiff:
DEFAZIO and JOHN DEFAZIO
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, Fibreboard Corp., JAMES R. COLSON and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
ARNOLD v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37873
Plaintiff:
ORDE E. ARNOLD
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, ISBRANDTSEN TANKERS, JAS. W. ELWELL COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED , TEXACO INC , CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , KEENE CORP and others
ALOISI et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as PAE/2:10-CV-64155
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., Sequoia Ventures Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ALOISI, ANN ALOISI and MARIO ALOISI
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Joe T. Summerlin
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation , Raymark Industries, Inc. , Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edna Somers, etc. v. Fibreboard Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-02545
Plaintiff:
Edna Somers, etc.
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corp
Delores Proud, et al. v. Fibreboard Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-08081
Plaintiff:
Delores Proud
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corp
Margaret Clements, et al. v. Fibreboard Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-00205
Plaintiff:
Margaret Clements
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corp
Elizabeth Ann Foley, et al. v. Fibreboard Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-03035
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Foley
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corp
Vivia Bethel, et al. v. Fibreboard Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-00999
Plaintiff:
Vivia Bethel
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
