Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vectura Limited v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 20-1054
Defendant / Appellant:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VECTURA LIMITED
MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL V BARR LABS
as 10-1432
Defendant-Appellant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Pliva-Hrvatska d.o.o., Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc., Glaxo Group Limited, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation and others
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01032
Plaintiff:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01714
Plaintiff:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv00908
Plaintiff:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MERZ PHARMA GMBH & CO. KGAA v. GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
as 2:2009mc00056
Respondent:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
Movant:
MERZ PHARMA GMBH & CO. KGAA
Cause Of Action: Local Question
TAFAS V KAPPOS
as 08-1352
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association and others
Defendant-Appellant:
David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC and others
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
GLAXO GROUP V KALI LABORATORIES
as 06-1026
Plaintiff-Appellee:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and others
Defendant-Appellant:
KALI LABORATORIES, INC., KALI LABORATORIES, INC. and KALI LABORATORIES, INC.
GLAXO GROUP V KALI LABORATORIES
as 05-1552
Plaintiff-Appellee:
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Defendant-Appellant:
KALI LABORATORIES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.