Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gold v. US Bancorp et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Abarr et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Richard Caton, Juan Estrada, Anthony Hollingsworth and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Emcore Corporation et al v. Phoenix Navigation Components, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05138
Defendant:
Mark P. Bowser, Does, Donald S. Gage and others
Plaintiff:
Emcore Corporation
Francisco Garcia v. Gage Avenue Market, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02012
Defendant:
DOES and Gage Avenue Market, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Garcia
Renato Rico v. Gage Village, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05929
Defendant:
Bodega Latina Corporation, Does and Gage Village, LLC
Plaintiff:
Renato Rico
Gez Agolli v. CA Progressive Medical Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04665
Plaintiff:
Gez Agolli
Defendant:
Kevin Banion, David C. Bianconi, Tim Boylan and others
Matteson et al v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02313
Plaintiff:
Christina Matteson , Becky Gress , Melanie Johnson and others
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management Inc
Troche et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gian Agosto Troche , Linda Albrecht , Crystal Apodaca and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. 711 East Gage Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90001
as 2:2011mj02936
Defendant:
711 East Gage Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90001 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
711 East Gage Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90001
as 2:2011mj02936
Defendant:
711 East Gage Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90001 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
